The directories say
'Truly a formidable advocate'
Constance has a traditional Chancery practice specialising in contentious probate, trust disputes, 1975 Act claims, administration of estates, and removal of personal representatives. She has appeared recently in several highly publicised High Court cases, including Schrader v Schrader (a successful probate claim based on undue influence), VIVA! Campaigns Ltd & The Vegetarian Society v Scott (a successful probate claim by charities concerning a schizophrenic testator) and Sheffield v Sheffield (in which she defended a professional trustee against allegations of breach of trust).
Her practice also includes constructive trusts and proprietary estoppel, Court of Protection (property and affairs), professional negligence, and real property.
She has appeared at first instance and on appeal in the Turks and Caicos Islands.
Constance was nominated as Chancery Junior of the Year in the 2013 Chambers Bar Awards and as Contentious Barrister of the Year in the 2013 ACTAPS Awards.
Constance is recommended as a Leading Junior (Band 1) in the field of Traditional Chancery by Chambers & Partners Guide to the Legal Profession (2014): “A firm favourite of both clients and instructing solicitors”, "Incredibly knowledgeable, unflappable and very precise," "Truly a formidable advocate", "She has a calm and authoritative manner which is effective with both judges and clients”.
Constance is also recommended as a Leading Junior (Band 3) in the field of Court of Protection (Property and Affairs) by Chambers & Partners (2014): “A sharp, intelligent barrister who is impressive on her feet. She has a concise and to-the-point manner.”
- VIVA! Campaigns Ltd & The Vegetarian Society v Scott  4097 (Ch) and  3639 (Ch) [costs]: Constance acted for the successful charitable Claimants in proceedings to prove a will made by a schizophrenic testator.
- Sheffield v Sheffield  EWHC 3927 (Ch): Constance defended a professional trustee against allegations of breach of trust.
- Schrader v Schrader  WTLR 701: Constance acted for the successful Part 20 claimant in proceedings to set aside his mother’s will on the basis that it had been procured by his brother’s undue influence.
- Tamlin v Edgar The Times, 23 February 2012. Constance acted for minor and unborn beneficiaries of two family trusts in an application for the Court's approval of a decision of the Trustees.
- Wharton v Bancroft  WTLR 693 and  WTLR 727 (costs). Constance acted for the successful claimant in proceedings to prove her husband's 'deathbed' will. Claimant was awarded indemnity costs.
- Devas v MacKay  EWHC 1951 (Ch),  All ER (D) 09 (Aug). Constance acted for the successful claimants in proceedings to set aside a will purportedly made by their mother in favour of her carer's son.
- Knight v Edonya  EWHC 2181 (Ch). Constance acted for the successful claimant in proceedings to prove her stepfather's will.
- Sinclair v Sinclair  EWHC 926 (Ch),  All ER (D) 17 (May). Constance acted for the trustees of a family trust in a claim arising out of various breaches of trust by a constructive trustee, involving issues as to his liability to account and whether he could rely upon proprietary estoppel.
- Raymond Saul & Co (a firm) v Holden  Ch 313,  BPIR 50. Constance acted for a successful trustee in bankruptcy on the issue as to whether the residue of the bankrupt's mother's estate was payable to the trustee in bankruptcy.
- Caudle v LD Law Ltd  1 WLR 1540, (2008) 11 ITELR 882. Constance acted for the successful Defendant on an appeal as to whether a prospective Administrator of a deceased's estate had locus standi to claim assets of the estate.
- Heyman and another v Dobson and another  WTLR 1151,  All ER (D) 275 (Dec): removal of personal representative and costs.
- Ustimenko v Prescot Management Company Ltd  EWHC 1853 (QB);  All ER (D) 48 (Aug): summary judgment in landlord & tenant dispute, civil restraint order
- Cadlock v Aboagye  All ER (D) 170 (Dec): bankruptcy appeal.
- Bonham v Blake Lapthorn Linnell  All ER (D) 164 (Oct): breach of trust and solicitors' negligence
- Evans v HSBC Trust Company (UK) Ltd  WTLR 1289. Constance acted for the successful claimants in a proprietary estoppel claim against the estate of their friend and neighbour.
- Cox v Jones  2 FLR 1010: constructive trust claim between cohabitees.
- Khiaban v Beard  1 WLR 1626. Constance acted for the successful appellant in a ‘leapfrog' appeal to the Court of Appeal on the issue as to whether the Court could require a claimant to increase value of his claim.
- Re OT Computers Ltd  1 Ch 317,  All ER (D) 144 (Oct). application for disclosure of policy under Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930,
- Carapeto v Good  WTLR 801. Constance acted for the successful claimant in proceedings to propound a will made in her favour.
Chancery Bar Association
Having attended St Paul's Girls' School, Constance read Classics at Oriel College, Oxford, before coming to the Bar.
Seminars and Publications
Constance was a speaker at the LegalWeek Trusts & Estate Litigation Forum in Provence in March 2012.
She has presented a 5-hour seminar on ‘Current issues in Contentious Probate' for Central Law Training in venues around England & Wales. She has also recently presented in-house seminars on contentious probate, and on costs issues in both probate and trusts disputes.
Constance has presented seminars for STEP on probate claims (in 2011), on ‘Perils and pitfalls in cohabitation disputes', and on ‘Orphan and unclaimed assets' focussing on the legality of heir-locators' contingency fees, on which she also published an article in the STEP Journal (Nov/Dec 2009) and in Private Client Business (2005) No.5 pp. 293-298 (co-authored with Richard Wilson). She has recently published articles in the Trust Quarterly Review February 2010 on Costs in Trusts Litigation, and in LegalWeek in April 2010 on developments in the Hastings-Bass rule.